From igor at sysoev.ru  Mon Oct  2 10:35:33 2017
From: igor at sysoev.ru (Igor Sysoev)
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 13:35:33 +0300
Subject: work queues in event engine
In-Reply-To: <201709301629595499963@qq.com>+1C4004FE4474E5BA
References: <201709112033108630799@qq.com>
 <201709301629595499963@qq.com>+1C4004FE4474E5BA
Message-ID: <2F713141-63B2-4837-B2D2-4A164853C3E4@sysoev.ru>

On 30 Sep 2017, at 11:38, 734819342 at qq.com wrote:

> Hello:
>     
>    Why there are many work queues in event engine? And what for respectively?
> 
> 
>     nxt_work_queue_cache_t     work_queue_cache;
>     nxt_work_queue_t           *current_work_queue;
>     nxt_work_queue_t           fast_work_queue;
>     nxt_work_queue_t           accept_work_queue;
>     nxt_work_queue_t           read_work_queue;
>     nxt_work_queue_t           socket_work_queue;
>     nxt_work_queue_t           connect_work_queue;
>     nxt_work_queue_t           write_work_queue;
>     nxt_work_queue_t           shutdown_work_queue;
>     nxt_work_queue_t           close_work_queue;
> 
>     nxt_locked_work_queue_t    locked_work_queue;


Syscall related operations are batched in queues.
It is unfinished now but will be completed soon.


-- 
Igor Sysoev
http://nginx.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/unit/attachments/20171002/cf85654f/attachment.html>

From igor at sysoev.ru  Thu Oct 19 15:35:34 2017
From: igor at sysoev.ru (Igor Sysoev)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:35:34 +0300
Subject: unit-0.2
Message-ID: <F583C36D-B31A-4F5A-A5E9-7285CAE408A1@sysoev.ru>

Changes with Unit 0.2                                            19 Oct 2017

    *) Feature: Go package improvements.

    *) Feature: configuration persistence.

    *) Feature: improved handling of configuration errors.

    *) Feature: application "timeout" property.

    *) Bugfix: Go application crashed under load.

    *) Bugfix: POST request for PHP were handled incorrectly.

    *) Bugfix: the router exited abnormally if all listeners had been
       deleted.

    *) Bugfix: the router crashed under load.

    *) Bugfix: memory leak in the router.


-- 
Igor Sysoev
http://nginx.com


From defan at nginx.com  Thu Oct 19 18:53:21 2017
From: defan at nginx.com (Andrei Belov)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 21:53:21 +0300
Subject: unit-0.2
In-Reply-To: <F583C36D-B31A-4F5A-A5E9-7285CAE408A1@sysoev.ru>
References: <F583C36D-B31A-4F5A-A5E9-7285CAE408A1@sysoev.ru>
Message-ID: <0B8F8EEB-0D61-4DFF-892A-4F01E39960CA@nginx.com>


> On 19 Oct 2017, at 18:35, Igor Sysoev <igor at sysoev.ru> wrote:
> 
> Changes with Unit 0.2                                            19 Oct 2017
> 
>    *) Feature: Go package improvements.
> 
>    *) Feature: configuration persistence.
> 
>    *) Feature: improved handling of configuration errors.
> 
>    *) Feature: application "timeout" property.
> 
>    *) Bugfix: Go application crashed under load.
> 
>    *) Bugfix: POST request for PHP were handled incorrectly.
> 
>    *) Bugfix: the router exited abnormally if all listeners had been
>       deleted.
> 
>    *) Bugfix: the router crashed under load.
> 
>    *) Bugfix: memory leak in the router.

[..]

For those who've been using precompiled binary packages, please note
that packages were relocated to http://packages.nginx.org/unit/

See the docs for up-to-date instructions:
http://unit.nginx.org/docs-installation.html#precompiled-packages


From samueldean at gmail.com  Fri Oct 20 20:47:05 2017
From: samueldean at gmail.com (Sam Freiberg)
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:47:05 -0700
Subject: Plans to support virtual hosts and Let's Encrypt
Message-ID: <CAHB7NhFy8-+CDCV5hpZWC1=wagU+ZdchPRs-9p75J02tAGgOzg@mail.gmail.com>

Just like the subject mentions I'm curious if there are any plans to
support virtual hosts or Let's Encrypt?

- Sam

-- 
Sam Freiberg
+ samueldean at gmail.com
+- http://netserious.com/ <http://www.darkaslight.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/unit/attachments/20171020/dd455b1f/attachment.html>

From vbart at nginx.com  Fri Oct 20 21:12:23 2017
From: vbart at nginx.com (Valentin V. Bartenev)
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 00:12:23 +0300
Subject: Plans to support virtual hosts and Let's Encrypt
In-Reply-To: <CAHB7NhFy8-+CDCV5hpZWC1=wagU+ZdchPRs-9p75J02tAGgOzg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHB7NhFy8-+CDCV5hpZWC1=wagU+ZdchPRs-9p75J02tAGgOzg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8875764.dSElcsJtqt@vbart-laptop>

On ???????, 20 ??????? 2017 ?. 23:47:05 MSK Sam Freiberg wrote:
> Just like the subject mentions I'm curious if there are any plans to
> support virtual hosts or Let's Encrypt?
> 
[..]

Yes and yes.

More sophisticated routing of requests and TLS with Let's Encrypt
integration are planned.

  wbr, Valentin V. Bartenev