FastCGI or Upstream proxy for python?

[Phillip B Oldham]

Nothing yet - was going to either use Paste/WebOb or web.py; looking for 
benchmarks for the smaller frameworks. However, I'm not adverse to using 
something a little different if its preferable for nginx. I understand 
sockets are faster than TCP, but is fastcgi better than upstream?

Sean Allen wrote:
> do you have an upstream server such as cherrypy already setup?
>
> if yes, that is going to be your fastest route.
>
> On Oct 7, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Phillip B Oldham wrote:
>
>> Which would be fastest/preferable to connect nginx to python? FastCGI 
>> (using Flup or similar) or the upstream module proxying to an http 
>> server such as cherrypy?
>> <phill.vcf>
>
>
>

-- 

*Phillip B Oldham*
The Activity People
phill at theactivitypeople.co.uk <mailto:phill at theactivitypeople.co.uk>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Policies*

This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named 
recipient(s) only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in 
error, please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. No action 
should be taken regarding content, nor must you copy or show them to anyone.

This e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is 
not a 100% secure communications medium, and we have taken steps to 
ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus. We must 
advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should 
ensure they are completely virus free, and that you understand and 
observe the lack of security when e-mailing us.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: phill.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20081008/81d3abe2/attachment.vcf>