Fast CGI (spawn-fcgi / php-cgi) crashes/dies/hangs
mike503 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 01:06:39 MSK 2009
This boggles my mind. Apache just for php...
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:43 PM, "nerdgrind" <nginx-forum at nginx.us> wrote:
> You could use Apache to serve PHP scripts rather than spawn-fcgi/php-
> cgi. Apache's handling of PHP has been time tested, and performs as
> well or better than fcgi in my experience on a high traffic
> Wordpress blog.
> We use:
> proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:8008;
> Apache can listen on several ports.
> I had a lot of headaches with fcgi, which made me question why I
> even needed it when I had Apache. On a single server Apache handled
> PHP and static files for 35 million visitors in a month before we
> started using Nginx, so using Apache only for PHP on the backend
> made sense.
> Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,28783,29032#msg-29032
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
More information about the nginx