zhang.libing at gmail.com
Tue Nov 10 04:37:50 MSK 2009
have a look at this project.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:10 AM, gerryw <nginx-forum at nginx.us> wrote:
> I considered FastCGI, but I'm interested in a self contained solution.
> There would be very little difference in the code between both approaches
> and I didn't see the point in pushing it out to FastCGI. After looking at
> the FastCGI module, it's looks like the code I outlined will work. The main
> issue seems to be returning control to nginx as soon as possible. Whether
> the threads are running from nginx or a separate FastCGI process should make
> little difference from a system/performance perspective. The self contained
> solution would be much easier to configure/run. Does anyone see any issues
> with the module based approach?
> Posted at Nginx Forum:
The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the nginx