zhang.libing at gmail.com
Tue Nov 10 04:44:15 MSK 2009
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:37 AM, 张立冰 <zhang.libing at gmail.com> wrote:
> have a look at this project.
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:10 AM, gerryw <nginx-forum at nginx.us> wrote:
>> I considered FastCGI, but I'm interested in a self contained solution.
>> There would be very little difference in the code between both approaches
>> and I didn't see the point in pushing it out to FastCGI. After looking at
>> the FastCGI module, it's looks like the code I outlined will work. The main
>> issue seems to be returning control to nginx as soon as possible. Whether
>> the threads are running from nginx or a separate FastCGI process should make
>> little difference from a system/performance perspective. The self contained
>> solution would be much easier to configure/run. Does anyone see any issues
>> with the module based approach?
>> Posted at Nginx Forum:
> The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time!
The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the nginx