[PATCH] websockets support for uwsgi protocol

Maxim Dounin mdounin at mdounin.ru
Wed Feb 20 16:41:37 UTC 2013


On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 04:20:29PM +0100, Roberto De Ioris wrote:

> >
> > Ok, so the next question is: any specific reason to exclude normal
> > CGI responses with "Status" as in your patch?
> >
> > I in fact don't like the idea of supporting http-like answers with
> > status like from CGI-like protocols, correct way is to use
> > "Status" header.  Not sure why Manlio introduced it at all,
> > probably due to some compatibility concerns (and due to the fact
> > that SCGI specification explicitly refuses to specify response
> > format).
> Honestly i do not remember why Manlio added support for nph (but i have
> added it to uWSGI SCGI parser too, so in my subconsciuous there should be
> a good reason :P)
> regarding your updated patch is better for sure

Committed, thnx.

Maxim Dounin

More information about the nginx mailing list