SEO gone mad...

[Aleksandar Lazic]

Hi.

Am 13-10-2015 22:11, schrieb steve:
> On 10/14/2015 09:03 AM, nanaya wrote:

[snipp]

>> You said
>> 
>>>>> As can be seen from the google article, it's apparently a bad 
>>>>> thing(tm)
>>>>> to duplicate content for example.com/ and example.com. Apparently 
>>>>> some
>> but the google article clearly says otherwise (unless you're referring
>> to a different google article).
>> 
> I suggest you re-read the article... whilst it does include the Chuck
> Norris quote, it also states 'While it’s not totally optimal behavior,
> it’s perfectly legitimate and a-okay. :)'.

To be honest wasn't the answers below not helpful?!

http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2015-October/048923.html
http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2015-October/048927.html
http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2015-October/048937.html

What's wrong with it?
I'm interested in a solution, thanks for sharing.

BR
Aleks