SEO gone mad...
al-nginx at none.at
Tue Oct 13 21:47:12 UTC 2015
Am 13-10-2015 22:11, schrieb steve:
> On 10/14/2015 09:03 AM, nanaya wrote:
>> You said
>>>>> As can be seen from the google article, it's apparently a bad
>>>>> to duplicate content for example.com/ and example.com. Apparently
>> but the google article clearly says otherwise (unless you're referring
>> to a different google article).
> I suggest you re-read the article... whilst it does include the Chuck
> Norris quote, it also states 'While it’s not totally optimal behavior,
> it’s perfectly legitimate and a-okay. :)'.
To be honest wasn't the answers below not helpful?!
What's wrong with it?
I'm interested in a solution, thanks for sharing.
More information about the nginx