Lua Variable access bug?

[agentzh]

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Maxim Dounin <mdounin at mdounin.ru> wrote:
>
> No, disregard this patch.  It will break things if new
> configuration will be rejected for some reason, as global in
> master will be left in an inconsistent state.  As a result
> incorrect worker processes will be spawn e.g. after abnormal
> termination of a worker process (or after SIGWINCH + SIGHUP
> sequence).
>
> Allocating temporary copy of a variable looks like the only
> correct way.
>

Indeed. Modifying static/global variables is almost always dangerous
for configuration reloading :)

Thanks!
-agentzh