nginx vs apache as a reverse proxy

Linden Varley Linden.Varley at ardec.com.au
Mon Mar 2 09:43:32 MSK 2009


I'm doing some simple testing on a FreeBSD 7.0 server comparing Apache2 vs Nginx as a reverse proxy to an Apache backend server. The backend serves mainly static images using mod_python.

I have yet to do thorough testing but it seems as though Apache2 has slightly higher throughput (KB/s measured using Jmeter) when compared to Nginx under moderate load.

Has anyone else found Apache to have a higher throughput as a reverse proxy? Can I assume it's because Nginx doesn't use http keep-alives to backend servers and thus creates a new connection upon each request?

Cheers

-          Linden



________________________________
The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal or professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that this email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received this communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of it or otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the sender of your incorrect receipt of this correspondence.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20090302/a5818a9f/attachment.html>


More information about the nginx mailing list