Module Question
张立冰
zhang.libing at gmail.com
Tue Nov 10 04:37:50 MSK 2009
have a look at this project.
http://github.com/rtyler/fastjs
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:10 AM, gerryw <nginx-forum at nginx.us> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I considered FastCGI, but I'm interested in a self contained solution.
> There would be very little difference in the code between both approaches
> and I didn't see the point in pushing it out to FastCGI. After looking at
> the FastCGI module, it's looks like the code I outlined will work. The main
> issue seems to be returning control to nginx as soon as possible. Whether
> the threads are running from nginx or a separate FastCGI process should make
> little difference from a system/performance perspective. The self contained
> solution would be much easier to configure/run. Does anyone see any issues
> with the module based approach?
>
> Thanks,
> -G
>
> Posted at Nginx Forum:
> http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,21573,21600#msg-21600
>
>
>
--
The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20091110/7c4e2e4b/attachment.html>
More information about the nginx
mailing list