split users

[jiang nan]

“users_split” is better


2010/5/13 Igor Sysoev <igor at sysoev.ru>

> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 06:00:59PM +0100, Phillip Oldham wrote:
>
> > On 12/05/2010 15:35, Igor Sysoev wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm developing a module for A/B split testing.
> > > The splitting is defined as:
> > >
> > > users_split "${remote_addr}AAA"   $variant {
> > >              0.5%                  one;
> > >              2.0%                  two;
> > >              -                     "";
> > > }
> > >
> > > The question is: what is the better English name:
> > > users_split
> > > user_split
> > > clients_split
> > > client_split
> > > or something else ?
> > >
> >
> > distribute_requests
> > dist_requests
> > split_requests
> > request_split
>
> I still considering two initial varaints: user_split or users_split.
> Does "users_split" sound good or not for English ear ?
>
>
> --
> Igor Sysoev
> http://sysoev.ru/en/
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>



-- 
jiangnan/jiangnan at corp-ci.com
025-86884590-1010
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20100513/bdae4dc6/attachment.html>