Limit IP req/s excl bots

[SplitIce]

My bad I missed that sentence in the docco.

Thanks, Ill be using map. That blog lead me down the wrong track.


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Maxim Dounin <mdounin at mdounin.ru> wrote:

> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:15:54PM +0930, SplitIce wrote:
>
> > I also think I found that 0 length keys wont be stored. This isn't in the
> > documentation but if I understand the code correctly they aren't, is this
> > correct?
>
> It's in the documentation, see http://nginx.org/r/limit_req_zone:
>
> : ... The key is any non-empty value of the specified variable (empty
> : values are not accounted). ...
>
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:06 PM, SplitIce <mat999 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone know if there is any truth to this blog post:
> > >
> http://gadelkareem.com/2012/03/25/limit-requests-per-ip-on-nginx-using-httplimitzonemodule-and-httplimitreqmodule-except-whitelist/
> > >
> > > And if so where about in the code its implemented? I was trying to find
> > > out if its possible to use a map to control limit req/s limits but I
> still
> > > cant find the code that does what that article says is possible.
>
> The configuration provided in the post linked doesn't do any
> whitelisting.  Though it's mostly trivial to introduce one using a
> map{}.
>
> --
> Maxim Dounin
> http://nginx.org/en/donation.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20130919/d7297f58/attachment.html>