Support team says Nginx + Passenger harder to support than Apache

[Dewangga]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Are you using system and/or config management to manage your third
party software? IMHO, nginx and apache is same, the different is only
on configuration and performance.

Pkgs, pacthes, updates, etc depend on each linux distribution. IMHO.

On 9/30/2014 23:41, drfence wrote:
> I work for a big news organization in the South East..  The support
> team is arguing that it's more difficult to support Nginx +
> Passenger because any patches, etc are made by updating source (
> compiling modules statically ) and re-installing.  This is as
> opposed to Apache that can be updated using yum with pre-built
> binaries.
> 
> Curious what people on this mailing list say about the support
> team argument.
> 
> Posted at Nginx Forum:
> http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,253635,253635#msg-253635
> 
> _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list 
> nginx at nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUKt9tAAoJEF1+odKB6YIxXmcH/R2XEajEDZ/ugiVEt0r56d44
EoGN+xtno1a1M3/5VuhpFBdK2D/MXxus7RxuS9HhNAovNMTWgjmee5pulhyeYyOW
uX9B5zdXtXRl9eTaGU+646d1lAEYv1HXpHuRxX8rUVFXF2ZFj4rLqEttk8+zj/5s
0vsT/p9CCQDgpugyUdWClkXsadMGUVOat6huVg5Wbo06dGuqu7IxbZpSGMA/7HG1
IGLLFbgH4+botm7knQCr1UwooQC6OI7N8vF8aV0f7LYwmZ/ZBkAOLwW0TQbFPld9
ap993bpRJ6EAlVZqTgwSzxRjzxPZKYB/6JtDXM2hO1SNGMvOe8N3MyKmqr/pK4E=
=Piv4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----