Poor NGINX Performance due to configurations

[Naseem Al-Naji]

Hey there! Yes, I believe it is mainly just how we have configured it. The
NGINX performs much better on our staging servers even though they only
have 1 worker process, whereas our production has 4 worker processes, where
4 is recommended.

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Payam Chychi <pchychi at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On 2015-10-08, 1:23 PM, Naseem Al-Naji wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> My company, Mulesoft, uses NGINX to help deliver our product. We use your
> commercialized version, and have noticed poor performance on our production
> servers, whereas our staging servers perform much better. The load
> balancing on production causes jumps in CPU:
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
>
> I was wondering if we could arrange a call to help us diagnose this
> problem. I've attached our nginx.conf that is running on an M3.XLarge EC2
> instance.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing listnginx at nginx.orghttp://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I assume this is not due to some system tune setting or IO issues?
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20151008/87fb8283/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 13520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20151008/87fb8283/attachment.png>