nginx a NIGHTMARE for me

Anoop Alias anoopalias01 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 25 03:22:30 UTC 2016


A bad workman always blames his tools !

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Amanat <nginx-forum at forum.nginx.org> wrote:
> i was using Apache from last 3 years. never faced a single problem. Few days
> ago i think to try Nginx. As i heard from mny people. Its very fast memory
> efficient webserver. Trust me guys. Nginx can never be memory efficient.
> Rather it consumes memory same like my mozilla. I never understand for what
> reason it creates a garbage of disk cache for every request.
> look at the pic
>
> http://i.imgur.com/pD7rEDe.png
>
> Though i like some features of Nginx like header modification and error
> 444.
>
> Apart from that Nginx is worst.
>
> My Server configuration:
> Architecture:          x86_64
> CPU op-mode(s):        32-bit, 64-bit
> Byte Order:            Little Endian
> CPU(s):                8
> On-line CPU(s) list:   0-7
> Thread(s) per core:    2
> Core(s) per socket:    4
> Socket(s):             1
> NUMA node(s):          1
> Vendor ID:             GenuineIntel
> CPU family:            6
> Model:                 58
> Model name:            Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz
> Stepping:              9
> CPU MHz:               1601.453
> CPU max MHz:           3800.0000
> CPU min MHz:           1600.0000
> BogoMIPS:              6784.50
> Virtualization:        VT-x
> L1d cache:             32K
> L1i cache:             32K
> L2 cache:              256K
> L3 cache:              8192K
> NUMA node0 CPU(s):     0-7
>
>
> I can use 2 Gb ram whole day with apache and with Nginx even 32 gb ram works
> only for 5 min.
>
> If any of you have any suggestion to tweak nginx config. Please tell me.
>
> Posted at Nginx Forum: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,269159,269159#msg-269159
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx



-- 
Anoop P Alias



More information about the nginx mailing list